Firecrawl vs ScrapingBee (2026)

Head-to-head on price, speed, privacy posture and features - based on our independent reviews of both providers.

Firecrawl homepage

Firecrawl

8.0

Best for feeding web content into language models

Visit Firecrawl →
VS
ScrapingBee homepage

ScrapingBee

8.3

Best developer experience for JavaScript-heavy sites

Visit ScrapingBee →

Score comparison

FirecrawlScrapingBeeWinner
Overall8.08.3ScrapingBee
Speed & reliability8.28.2Tie
Privacy & trust7.47.8ScrapingBee
Features & coverage8.48.4Tie
Value for money8.08.2ScrapingBee
Ease of use9.49.4Tie

Side by side

FirecrawlScrapingBee
Starting priceFreeFree
Service typesScraping APIsScraping APIs
JurisdictionUnited States in the 5 EyesFrance in the 9 Eyes
Logging policyNot a privacy service; operational logs by designNot a privacy service; operational logs by design
Independent auditsNone publishedNone published
Network - -
Country coverage3030
Money-back guarantee - -
Free tier
Supportemail, slack, knowledge-baseemail, chat, knowledge-base
Pay with crypto - -

Which should you pick?

Choose Firecrawl if this fits: best for feeding web content into language models. Firecrawl converts websites into clean markdown built for LLM ingestion, with an open-source core you can self-host. The obvious pick for RAG pipelines.

Choose ScrapingBee if this fits: best developer experience for javascript-heavy sites. ScrapingBee is the most pleasant scraping API to build against, with genuinely excellent docs, browser scenarios and AI extraction. European basing is a bonus.

Overall, our scores favor ScrapingBee (8.3 vs 8.0) - but the right choice depends on which trade-offs matter to you. Read the full Firecrawl review and ScrapingBee review.