GoodAccess vs Twingate (2026)
Head-to-head on price, speed, privacy posture and features - based on our independent reviews of both providers.
Score comparison
| GoodAccess | Twingate | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 7.7 | 8.6 | Twingate |
| Speed & reliability | 8.0 | 8.6 | Twingate |
| Privacy & trust | 7.8 | 8.0 | Twingate |
| Features & coverage | 7.8 | 9.0 | Twingate |
| Value for money | 8.6 | 8.8 | Twingate |
| Ease of use | 9.0 | 9.2 | Twingate |
Side by side
| GoodAccess | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $7/user/mo | $6/user/mo |
| Service types | Business VPN & ZTNA | Business VPN & ZTNA |
| Jurisdiction | Czechia outside 5/9/14 Eyes | United States in the 5 Eyes |
| Logging policy | Not a privacy service; operational logs by design | Minimal metadata retained |
| Independent audits | None published | Doyensec (2023) |
| Network | 100 servers | - |
| Country coverage | 35 | 20 |
| Money-back guarantee | 14 days | - |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Support | chat, email, tickets | email, slack, knowledge-base |
| Pay with crypto | - | - |
Which should you pick?
Choose GoodAccess if this fits: best value business vpn for teams under 50. GoodAccess bundles the dedicated static IP into its entry paid plan rather than charging separately, which makes it the cheapest honest way for a small team to get an allowlistable gateway.
Choose Twingate if this fits: best zero-trust replacement for a corporate vpn. Twingate is what most companies should be buying instead of a corporate VPN: per-resource access, no exposed ports, and a deployment measured in minutes rather than weeks.
Overall, our scores favor Twingate (8.6 vs 7.7) - but the right choice depends on which trade-offs matter to you. Read the full GoodAccess review and Twingate review.